Vernacular and Transnational Urbanism
Vernacular
Transnational
Henry Glassie describes this architectural style in his article titled Vernacular Architecture, as one which is created by the locals and the land around them. Materials of the earth are used to create natural living spaces which adjust to the needs of the designer. The designer in this case is not some real estate company, but the person who actually lives in the structure.
The Janus Face of Architectural Terrorism by Eric Darton paints the picture of large structures made from steel encroaching on the once unique land of the people and utilizing it for purposes unknown to the public. These buildings which are built in cities all over the world from Bangkok, to Cairo and Bogota. Yet if shown these buildings, one would never be able to guess where they were.
When looking at these two types of development, it can be easy to disregard them as separate. However upon closer examination you can see that they share a commonality in the idea of creative destruction. Vernacular destroys the land around people in order to erect homes, and living spaces, while Transnational redevelops this land to fit the need of the modern corporation. To further develop this image in your mind, think of the creation of a log cabin. This scenario was brought up by Glassie and shows the destruction of nature to establish a home. Conversely, Darton described the destruction of small businesses, and radio row in order to build the World Trade Center in New York. While different, when reduced to their core ideas, vernacular, and transnational urbanism fit the same profile of creative destruction in order to suit the dominators needs.